You are Here : Moneycontrol Forum Forum Topics Stocks

Idea Cellular

ias2507
Bronze Member

775 Messages

CHRONOLOGY OF THE AGR CONTROVERSY:.......(1).....(1994) : With the introduction of the National Telecom Policy, a number of companies were issued telecom licences, for which they were expected to pay a fixed fee every year.......(2).....(1999):The service providers failed to pay the licence fee and had to be given a bailout package vide a letter dated July 22, 1999.According to this letter, service providers had to pay a certain portion of their adjusted gross revenue (AGR) as licence fee with effect from August 1, 1999. The government was to decide the proportion of AGR to be charged as licence fee after receiving the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI).After the licence agreement was amended and anAGR-based mechanism was introduced, all service providers had to pay their license fees on the basis of the AGR definition prescribed by the government.......(3)....(2003) : A few members of the Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (AUSPI) moved the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) questioning the validity of AGR definition in the license agreement.........(4).....(2006) : On July 7, TDSAT held that service providers needed to pay as licence fee a portion of their revenue from those activities that were related to the telecom licence, not other activities. With regard to this, it sought TRAI s recommendations on the definition of licensed and non-licensed activities. TRAI subsequently gave its recommendations defining the items to be included in the AGR for payment of licence fee.......(5).....(2007):The department of telecommunications (DoT) challenged in the Supreme Court TDSAT s jurisdiction over terms of the telecom licences that had previously been accepted unconditionally by licencees.In an order dated January 19, the apex court dismissed DoT s appeal, and directed it to raise its contentions before TDSAT.On August 30, TDSAT accepted most of  TRAI srecommendations and passed an order that would be applicable to those AUSPI  members that had moved the TDSAT with effect from the date when they filed their petitions.AUSPI and the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) filed a review petition urging that the TDSAT order be made applicable to all members of the two bodies from the date of filing of their petition.DoT again moved the Supreme Court against the August 30 TDSAT order. Even as the DoT appeal was pending before the apex court, some telcos filed petitions before TDSAT requesting to be included in the tribunal s August 30 order.......

9.57 PM Jul 31st
We take the quality of the messages posted on forum as seriously as our articles. Kindly follow our Code of Conduct and refrain from posting any abusive, promotional or gibberish content on forum.
Disclaimer : The views expressed in the forum are the views of the user writing the post, and not that of moneycontrol.com. You agree, by accessing this forum, that moneycontrol.com bears no liability for any posts on this forum or, any losses suffered by following any advice posted on this forum. moneycontrol.com operates this real time, open, unmoderated, private forum for users to exchange information and to discuss various investing techniques. moneycontrol.com or, its personnel do not post anything, or vet the content posted, on this forum. moneycontrol.com reserves the right to deny service to anyone. You, and not moneycontrol.com, assume the entire cost and risk of any trading you choose to undertake. You are solely responsible for making your own investment decisions. If you choose to engage in such transactions with or without seeking advice from a licensed and qualified financial advisor or entity, then such decision and any consequences flowing therefrom are your sole responsibility.

Ok

Get your own permanent - nickname

Choose your nickname

Your permanent Nickname can be distinct from your username and no one need know the link between the two.

Sections