Platinum Member
132 Followers
“Certain sections were pressing for complete withdrawal of the sugarcane ordinance, which would have resulted in a windfall of Rs. 14,000 crore for the sugar mills at the cost of the Central exchequer. Who were they helping? Certainly not the farmers,” he said.
The government had, through the ordinance, brought in a Validation Act that said the calculation of levy sugar price to be paid to millers by the Centre will be based on the minimum price and therefore, the court order based on SAP was negated, saving the government a burden of Rs 14,000 crore. However, by deleting 3B from the Sugarcane Control (Amendment) Order, 2009 and restoring the SAP, the financial burden on the Centre for payment of levy price to millers on the basis of SAP for future years may stand.
“The Bill, which we were thinking of introducing and getting cleared, was to protect the interest of the farmers vis-À-vis the millers. The Fair and Remunerative Price [FRP] is a benchmark price. It is the minimum that millers have to pay,” Mr. Pawar said.
1.57 AM Nov 24th 2009  | Track

No Replies
BAJAJ HIND NETWORK
sharp view
Gold Member
srlevels
Platinum Member
Hari Mohan
Gold Member
niftydumbtrader
New Member
maninagarajan
New Member
DarkH
New Member
Related stocks
677 messages Platinum Member

31
KotakInvestment
Platinum Member

11661
marketman
Platinum Member

4294
Santosh Nair
Platinum Member

4224
Indira Vergis
Platinum Member

2808
chief_kamani
Platinum Member

2559
Expert Chartist
Platinum Member

4846
Market Statistician
Platinum Member

3350
Shishir Asthana
Platinum Member

1268
Indira Vergis
Platinum Member

2808
Santosh Nair
Platinum Member

4224
Pak will grant MFN status to India 'very soon'. Do we really need a MFN status from Pakistan?
Yes
No

Explore Messageboard