Platinum Member
674 Followers
2.23 PM Oct 3rd 2012  | Track
Replies (32)
Gold Member
4 Followers
7.37 AM Oct 6th 2012
Platinum Member
199 Followers
PM send dear to U.thanks
1.31 PM Oct 5th 2012
Silver Member
8 Followers
how are we going to send the open letter to AM? through what mean? like news channel or how we are going to send?
1.19 PM Oct 5th 2012
Platinum Member
199 Followers
may be a technical snag!
12.05 PM Oct 5th 2012
Silver Member
8 Followers
what is happening at Nifty. It fell around 900 points and NSE is closed for some time. what is going wrong.
12.05 PM Oct 5th 2012
Platinum Member
199 Followers
It is a matter of 10 days to start journey to SATYAM truth!
10.55 AM Oct 5th 2012
Silver Member
8 Followers
and also his 5000cr will be inside the satyam only. he use reserve like anything to acquire many companies. and the company is free for him. in 3G bidding have the money to GOVT no return back.
10.39 AM Oct 5th 2012   |         |  Rated by
Silver Member
8 Followers
I was feeling like this and it was just my opinion. What Mr Ani*l Amba*ni was doing during MS bidding. He spent almost 9000cr for 3G what he is getting output?. He is suffering for getting profit. If he would have spent even 5000cr to acquire satyam, his prosperity might be different. the share value might be different today.
10.37 AM Oct 5th 2012   |         |  Rated by
Platinum Member
483 Followers
Sir even ur own example shows that in the longer run a better ratio for msat holders benefits them AS IT SHOULD based on performance of msat . When the combined entity rate improves every quarter after the merger u will get more for ur msat equivalent than u would now based on present ratio. For example combined entity price at 1200 will give u 1.20 lac at present but 1.65 lac with the improved ratio.
9.03 PM Oct 4th 2012
Platinum Member
483 Followers
A better merger ratio in favour of msat holders will reflect reality and benefit msat holders in the longer run vis a vis techm holders for in the ultimate analysis the share price of the combined will be reflecting the combined results. In the present case it does not reflect reality of performance of the two entities and is therefore loaded in favour of techm shareholders INSPITE of everyone knowing that the combined entity PERFORMANCE is and will depend to a large extent on msat performance and not techm performance. Techm has also been around for donkeys years without any glamour or great performance barring a couple of years and that too bec of BT patronage. TECHM here is a like a player who stood 4th and is declared the winner ignoring the first 3 winners as participants to spur the 4th place winner
8.46 PM Oct 4th 2012   |         |  Rated by
Gold Member
16 Followers
I do not think it is a fair assessment, it might correct upto 900 at worst.
12.05 PM Oct 4th 2012
Platinum Member
15 Followers
Reducing merger ratio will also not have any significant impact on MS rates because if the ratio is reduced TM rate will correct substantially and MS will settle down accoring to TM rates after that. In the end every investor in MS will get TM shares which has appreciated more than 60% on back of strong MS working. 850 shares of MS today will give 100 shares of TM equvilent to approx Rs 1 Lac. Suppose merger ratio is reduced to 6:1 and TM rate corrects to 750/-. You will get 142 shares of TM for Rs 1.05 lac. This may be the reason for other large investors/ institutions not opposing the merger ratio.
11.34 AM Oct 4th 2012   |     |  Rated by
Platinum Member
68 Followers
Reposted about 228 days 22 hrs 40 min 7 sec ago by carya1 and 1 others
If there is a way to throw out the management, let them be shown the door. They deserve this. They have looted all retail investors. Who cares for the merger?

I hope courts will teach a lessor to this greedy corporates..and whatever they bought with Msat money shoould be shown in Msat books with increase in revenue, profits & EPS.

MSat can grown on its own. It has enough money for big ticket acquisitions. Worst case, they can merger with Igate and Patni and make Phaneesh as CEO. At least we will get a very goood leader
10.46 AM Oct 4th 2012   |         |  Rated by
Platinum Member
483 Followers
Reposted about 228 days 22 hrs 54 min 26 sec ago by carya1
What u say is the general norm and it is tough to beat it without a sympathetic court hearing. The path is made tougher by virtue of lic, l/t etc not raising any objection to merger ratio and hence court will be inclined to believe that ratio is fair. What needs to be attacked in any petition in this case is that msat management itself had said that it is an icu patient and will come out of icu after 3 years and hence financials after the three years period alone should be considered for merger purpose in the interest of fairness and natural justice principles
9.42 AM Oct 4th 2012   |         |  Rated by
Platinum Member
674 Followers
sounds very cheap on 5 times multiples of 1.8 billion rev, which used to be 2.5 billion.
11.01 AM Oct 4th 2012   |         |  Rated by
MAHINDRA SATYAM NETWORK
warandpeace
Platinum Member
sudsstocker
Gold Member
bullguru5100
Platinum Member
manjitmc
New Member
Straightman
New Member
manoshri
New Member
Related stocks
Infosys 58682
TCS 35529
Geodesic 31769
3i Infotech 15854
see all
14660 messages Platinum Member

1091
SP Tulsian
Platinum Member

22157
KotakInvestment
Platinum Member

20809
Sudarshan Sukhani
Platinum Member

16687
marketman
Platinum Member

7559
Ambareesh Baliga
Platinum Member

4177
SP Tulsian
Platinum Member

22157
Sudarshan Sukha...
Platinum Member

16687
Santosh Nair
Platinum Member

14862
MOSL Advisory (...
Platinum Member

2550
IT Dept slaps Rs 582 cr tax demand notice on Infosys. Will this new tax demand notice pull back of Infosys stock this week?
Yes
No

(March 07, 2013)

Sign up & stay Profitable

Explore Messageboard