Telangana has become a headache and prestige issue to TRS and JAC other activists. None of activists have done any good or serivice to the people. Their only agenda has been to incite innocent students and people and brainwash them of separate state. Not even 1% population of Telangana interested in the separate state. Talk about culture and identity is only eye wash. Culture and identity will not provide even a single morsel of food.
Instead of spending their energies like this they should help poor in bettering their lives. This is more than getting a separate state.

The activists ( I dont call them leaders ) have spoiled the fabric of society for their own neurotic psychic egoistic satisfaction of black achievement at the cost of people. They are all gathering negative karma which will reflect badly on them. Let us pray they will become good and useful to the society.
When I see their faces I find them like wounded soldier not sure of their end. It is not too late. Let the people of Telangana live happily.

the position of hyderabad came to 6th due to (1) growth in other cities (2) pulling down the positionm by continuous bandhs and vandalism on streets by TRS. Who is responsible united state or agitation for power

some people are saying that , kill telugu people unity, actually Telangana is not a new state before andhra bifurcating from tamilnadu, Telangana is a state in india, check the history. after forming andhra (divided from tamilnadu, why they divided from tamilnadu) the nadhra people eye on hydeabad because hyd is developed city its 3rd developed city in india.after merging with andhra the city rank is 6th(is this development).we are asking not a new state we are asking a merged state to divide.

It will kill the Telugu language, If we see history of India the present Andraites have migrated from northern parts of India. In Sanskrit Telugu mean people who moved to south. In every place Brothers fight ferociously for their parental property the quarrels between siblings is the most dangerous in any persons life. People will not be so much hurt if they loose their own earning but if one enjoy little more it can not be tolerated by another brother.

yes if that will end all the bad things only then it allowed

Dear Attota jee,

Agreeable partially. My views remain to be the same as conveyed to HK jee.

Tilak R Sharma
4th Oct 2012*

Dear HK jee,

I agree that, further division may give way to political fall outs and must be avoided. But, my concentration and thrust line was on developmental aspects and employment avenues which cannot be lost sight of. No doubt many times more than the benefits which common man can derive/enjoy, political class shall outnumbers and shall have a hay day. All said and done, there is an urgent need on the part of government to sell its products / be decisive and settle the issue before it is too late and common is the biggest victim of bundhs and strikes which cripple the day to life and provision of essential commodities.

Tilak R Sharma
4th Oct 2012*

I don`t accept ease of governance and development, each state is divided in to districts and development work is entrusted to district level political body called Zilla panchyath. Smaller states creation is only to stop a major political formation in a state. Like Bihar, up etc have carved of bigger states but the leaders like Malyam singh, mayavathi, lalluprasad.... could not establish their parties in both states. They lost mandate of more people in a single larger state. If congress loose power to TDP it`s leader can influence national politics but in a divided state TDP can not establish it`s base in telangana. There will be Congress and muslim league in new formed Telangana. KCR will never become CM of Telangana at any cost.

smaller states need not be answer to all problems. Being smaller, there can be no bigger participation or roll to participate in big decision reg national policies. It is evident that small states could provide big opportunities to the unemployed politicians whose dreams could not be realised in big states. The history of Telangana state under Niam tyranny and the woes of innocent people in the hands of land lords and the subsequent revolt may come back if separation is accepted.Separation is a political need and NOT people`s need.

Dear MMB jee,

The long felt need and aspirations of the people of Telangana region should be addressed in the largest interest of the nation. Experience entails that the smaller the region/state better it is for governance and provision of better amenities to the people. There are example of bifurcation of states one time having larger geo limit but on division, they are administered far better than in the times gone - by. Madhya Pradesh having given birth to Chhatisgarh, Uttar Pradesh having followed the precedence and carved out UK and Bihar having paved the way for Jharkhand. It is noteworthy that, division of area/small states leads to generation of employment, development of infrastructure vis-a-vis industry given serious attention besides easy reach of officials to the farthest corner of the state to have an easy access/close eye on betterment of the life style of common man. Thus, like any other state having extended boundary, Telangana too needs a serious look/attention by the centre.

Tilak R Sharma
4th Oct 2012*

No don`t give any separate state to anybody!
You are talking these separate states for politicians, and not for the peace loving people!!

A new set of crooked politicians are waiting to suck people`s money. Roads,water, electricity will continue to be the shame that is is today. JAI HO!

No telangana.....................CONGRESS WIN 2014 ELECTION...........NO DOUBT.........

if telanga given than in every state new state demand will be on..........